Navigation:  Step-By-Step Examples >

Example 10: A Shear Wall

Previous pageReturn to chapter overviewNext page

Problem Description

A two-story concrete shear wall is subjected to two horizontal point forces at the floor levels.  The wall is 37.5 ft long and 21 ft high, with six openings of 7.5 x 4.5 ft.

 

Material:  E = 4e6 psi; ν = 0.15

 

Thicknesses: t = 12 inch.

 

Example 10 A Shear Wall1

 

Suggested Modeling Steps

Set proper units from Settings and Tools > Units & Precisions.

Generate the plate by Create > Templates > Rectangular Shells.  Enter a distance list of “3@1, 21@1.5, 3@1” for the X direction and a distance list of “3@1, 10@1.5, 3@1” for the Y direction.

Select the middle eight nodes at each opening and delete them.  The shells that are connected to these nodes are deleted automatically.

Select all shell elements, define and assign material properties by Modify > Shell Properties > Materials. Make sure “Assign active material to currently selected elements” is checked in the dialog box.

Select all shell elements, define and assign the shell thickness properties by Modify > Shell Properties > Thicknesses.  Make sure “Assign active thickness to currently selected shells” is checked in the dialog box.

Press ESC key to unselect all.  Select the nodes at the bottom and assign them fixed supports.

Select the two nodes at each story level and assign them nodal loads by Create > Draw Loads > Nodal Loads.

Set the analysis options by Analysis > Analysis Options.  Choose the model type “2D Plane Stress”.   Check “Use incompatible formulation for shell membrane actions or bricks”.

 

Results

No comparison of results is available.  Displacement Dx contour and Stress Syy contour is provided in the following.

 

Example 10 A Shear Wall2

Displacement Dx contour on deflected shape

 

 

Example 10 A Shear Wall3

Stress Syy contour

 

To verify the results, the horizontal shear is checked at the middle elevation of the second story openings.  The following table shows the “Membrane nodal resultants” of four piers by View > Display Options (annotation mode = “Annotate selected entities” to avoid congestion of texts).  You may also view the same nodal resultants in a spreadsheet by Analysis Results > Shell Forces, Moments & Stresses > Shell Nodal Resultants.  You can then copy and paste selected data to your preferred spreadsheet program to perform summation or other computations. It is important to point out that nodal resultants are expressed in the element local coordinate systems.

 

Pier 1

 

ΣFx =

0.432 + 0.654

+ 0.602 + 1.269

+ 0.445 - 0.427

= 2.975 kips

Example 10 A Shear Wall4

Pier 2

 

ΣFx =

1.758 + 3.226

+ 7.226 + 5.786

+ 3.144 + 2.722

= 23.862 kips

 

 

Example 10 A Shear Wall5

Pier 3

 

ΣFx =

1.401 + 2.325

+ 5.068 + 4.486

+ 2.323 + 1.875

= 17.478 kips

 

Example 10 A Shear Wall6

Pier 4

 

ΣFx =

 

0.153 + 0.729

+ 1.83 + 1.334

+ 0.965 + 0.673

= 5.684 kips

 

 

Example 10 A Shear Wall7

All Piers ΣFx = 2.975 + 23.862 + 17.478 + 5.684  = 49.999 (app.= 50 kips)

 

Membrane nodal resultants of four piers at the middle elevation of the second story

 

Comments

The example problem shows how to perform structural analysis on a shear wall.  Although no comparison of results is available, we demonstrate the reliability of the program by checking the horizontal shear.

 

In designing concrete sections, we generally need forces and moments instead of stresses.  We may acquire axial forces and moments in the same manner as in shears.  For example, to determine the moment at the second pier above, we may sum the moments by nodal resultants Fy about the center of the pier.

 

Example 10 A Shear Wall8

 

Fyi (kips)

Xi (ft)

Fyi * Xi (ft-kips)

-2.284

-2.25

5.139

1.663

-0.75

-1.24725

-8.458

-0.75

6.3435

4.611

0.75

3.45825

-3.718

0.75

-2.7885

3.082

2.25

6.9345

ΣFy = -5.104

 

 

sum = 17.8395

 

Internal Forces and Moment at middle of the second pier

Axial Force = -5.104 kips

Shear Force = 23.862 kips

Moment = 17.8395 ft-kips

 

You are encouraged to model this wall with members and compare the results with those in this example.  Care should be exercised in segmenting the members and assigning them appropriate section properties.  Since the sections of the members are relatively deep, shear deformations must be considered.