Navigation:  Static - Shell Element >

D-04 (Scordelis-Lo Roof)

Previous pageReturn to chapter overviewNext page

Objective

To verify the membrane and bending behavior of the shell element in a curved structure

 

Problem Description

The Scordelis-Lo barrel roof below [Ref 1, Ref 2] has a length of 50 ft, a radius of 25 ft, and a sweeping angle of 80 degrees.  The roof is supported on rigid diaphragms along its two curved edges (Dx and Dy fixed, but not Dz). The two straight edges are free.  A surface load of -90 lb/ft^2 in the global Y direction (self weight) is applied to the entire roof.

 

Material: E = 4.32e8 lb/ft^2 (3e6 psi); v = 0.0;

 

Thickness: t = 0.25 ft.

 

D-04 (Scordelis-Lo Roof)1

 

Finite Element Model

36 shell elements

Due to symmetry, one quarter of the roof is modeled with a 6x6 mesh. The boundary conditions are specified in the following table.

Nodes

Fixed DOFs

N1 to N6

Z, OX, OY

N7

X, Z, OX, OY, OZ

N14, N21, N26, N35, N42

X, OY, OZ

N43 to N48

X, Y, OZ

N49

X, Y, OY, OZ

 

Model type: 3D Frame and Shell

D-04 (Scordelis-Lo Roof)2

 

Results

The results given by ENERCALC 3D compare well with benchmark values.

Units: displacement – ft; stress - ksf

 

Displacement Dy @ N1

 

Displacement  Dx @ N1

 

Top Principal Stress S1 @ N7

Bottom Principal Stress S2 @ N7

Top Principal Stress S1 @ N1

Bottom Principal Stress

S1 @ N1

MITC4

Compatible

-0.291

-0.153

171.74

-197.69

242.55

349.35

MITC4

Incompatible

-0.307

-0.162

183.97

-210.78

225.09

352.77

Kirchhoff

Compatible

-0.290

-0.153

174.88

-200.62

238.73

351.68

Kirchhoff

Incompatible

-0.306

-0.161

187.55

-214.41

224.46

352.69

Benchmark

Value

-0.302

-0.159

191.23

-218.74

215.57

340.70

 

Comments

The results given by ENERCALC 3D are comparable to the referenced values.

 

Reference

[1]. MacNeal & Harder, “A Proposed Standard Set of Problems to Test Finite Element Accuracy”, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 1 (1985) 3-20

[2]. Scordelis & Lo, “Computer Analysis of Cylindrical Shells”, Journal of the American Concrete Institute, Volume 61, May, 1964